"not for canada - australian in disguise" (for-canada)
06/24/2016 at 00:51 • Filed to: None
3
16|
"not for canada - australian in disguise" (for-canada)
06/24/2016 at 00:51 • Filed to: None | 3
| 16 |
At least the Commonwealth can bond over our shitty currencies... right?
Dusty Ventures
> not for canada - australian in disguise
06/24/2016 at 00:59 |
|
Just wait until Britain standardizes the Pound across the commonwealth.
ranwhenparked
> Dusty Ventures
06/24/2016 at 01:03 |
|
They can’t, Britain lost all remaining legislative powers over any Commonwealth country some 30 years ago.
PanchoVilleneuve ST
> Dusty Ventures
06/24/2016 at 01:03 |
|
They better hurry up, they’ve got like 2 more hours before it loses all of its value entirely, at the rate it’s dropping.
|
ranwhenparked
> not for canada - australian in disguise
06/24/2016 at 01:03 |
|
Zimbabwe laughs at your concept of a shitty currency.
For Sweden
> ranwhenparked
06/24/2016 at 01:14 |
|
Britain also has a navy
facw
> For Sweden
06/24/2016 at 01:57 |
|
If they couldn’t afford to operate their new carriers before, I’m sure it will be even easier now...
And of course if there’s a new independence vote in Scotland, they’ll lose both the shipyard where those carriers are built and their nuclear sub base.
Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero
> not for canada - australian in disguise
06/24/2016 at 02:40 |
|
Fuck that noise. Canada needs to get its dollar up so the NHL salary cap rises even more so the Blackhawks aren’t in cap hell the next 4 or 5 years. Get your shit together canada
Amoore100
> ranwhenparked
06/24/2016 at 03:10 |
|
Can confirm, have a one hundred trillion dollar note sitting in front of me.
Sam
> facw
06/24/2016 at 03:40 |
|
I have a feeling that even if Scotland ditched the UK, they’d still maintain good enough relations to keep the facilities. Either that, or it would be a Guantanamo Bay situation where the facilities stay a part of England.
|
facw
> Sam
06/24/2016 at 06:46 |
|
The shipyard would obviously be accessible at some cost. The sub base is trickier, as anti-nuke people would want to shut it down, and when it’s not yours, there’s less pressure to reject that. Seems like a lease until the UK builds a new facility would be likely though.
|
Dusty Ventures
> ranwhenparked
06/24/2016 at 06:49 |
|
Let me have my fun
Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
> Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero
06/24/2016 at 06:49 |
|
Sorry, but we elected a selfie and there’s nothing we can do about it
DipodomysDeserti
> For Sweden
06/24/2016 at 06:53 |
|
That would be interesting. Britain invades Canada and the US comes to the rescue. Almost like a reverse War of 1812.
chaozbandit
> not for canada - australian in disguise
06/24/2016 at 08:24 |
|
Canadian rupees > what even is the pound
Wrong Wheel Drive (41%)
> Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero
06/24/2016 at 08:38 |
|
No, going to Canada and having all that "free" money after the conversion is awesome.
The Powershift in Steve's '12 Ford Focus killed it's TCM (under warranty!)
> For Sweden
06/24/2016 at 16:15 |
|
They have 19 surface combatants, out of 77 ships total. They used to have a navy.